ApolloSRMApolloSRM
A genAI Policy Your Whole School Can Actually Follow, Right Down to the Course

Compliance

A genAI Policy Your Whole School Can Actually Follow, Right Down to the Course

Apollo Intelligence· June 23, 2026

A one-size-fits-all AI policy fails the first instructor who teaches a course where AI is the whole point, or where it is banned outright. ApolloSRM scopes genAI policy at the institution, program, or course level, resolves the most specific one automatically, and keeps academic-integrity cases in human hands.

ApolloSRM lets you set a genAI policy at the institution, program, or course level, each with a stance (prohibited, restricted, or permitted) and a disclosure rule, and it resolves the most specific one automatically, so a course policy wins over a program policy, which wins over the institution default. When misuse is suspected, including AI misuse, it opens an academic-integrity case that a person reviews to resolution. Nothing accuses a student on its own.

Why one school-wide rule breaks

The responsible-AI conversation keeps colliding with reality. The same campus has a coding course where using AI tools is the skill being taught, a clinical course where unsupervised AI is unacceptable, and a writing course somewhere in between. A single institution-wide policy is either too loose for the clinical course or too strict for the coding one, and either way instructors quietly ignore it. The policy has to be scoped to survive contact with the actual schedule.

Scoped policy, resolved automatically

You set the institution default, then override it where it matters with a program-level or a course-level stance. ApolloSRM resolves whichever applies: the course policy if there is one, then the program’s, then the default. Each policy carries whether students have to disclose their AI use, so a permitted-with-disclosure course and a prohibited course can live on the same campus without contradicting each other. The student and the instructor see the rule that actually governs their situation, not a generic banner nobody reads.

Integrity cases stay human

When AI misuse, plagiarism, or any integrity concern comes up, it becomes a case: reported, reviewed, and resolved or dismissed by a person. ApolloSRM does not run a detector that auto-flags and auto-penalizes a student, because an AI accusation no human reviewed is exactly the failure the field keeps warning about. The posture is the same everywhere in the product: AI helps with the judgment, a person makes the call.

One ruleset, many cockpits

A policy is not one rule. It is the right rule in the right place, applied consistently and enforced by people. ApolloSRM scopes it, resolves it automatically, and keeps the final accusation in human hands, so every course flies under the rule it should and nobody is left guessing.

Ready to fly your school on one platform?

Go for launch, start free →

More from the Mission Log