
Accreditation
Your Accreditor Wants Licensure Pass Rates. First-Time, Ultimate, and Per Program.
The accreditation overhaul puts licensure and certification pass rates near the top of the student-achievement measures. ApolloSRM tracks every sitting and reports both the first-time and the ultimate rate, counted by student, with a small-cohort floor so you never publish a misleading number.
ApolloSRM records every licensure and certification exam sitting for each student and reports two numbers per program: the first-time pass rate, which is first-attempt passes over first-attempt takers, and the ultimate pass rate, which is distinct students who eventually passed over distinct takers. It counts by student, so someone who fails and later passes counts once, and it holds back the rate below a small-cohort floor of ten, so a two-person program never reads as a tidy 50 percent.
Why this is suddenly a headline measure
The AIM rulemaking and the broader Part 602 overhaul push accreditors away from “did you follow the process” and toward “what did students achieve.” For a career college, the most concrete achievement there is goes the licensure or certification exam a graduate has to pass to actually work, in nursing, cosmetology, the trades, allied health. An accreditor asking for that rate is not asking for an estimate. They want it tracked, per program, and computed the same way every time.
First-time and ultimate are different questions
The first-time rate tells you how well the program prepares a student to pass on the first try, which is the cleanest read on curriculum quality. The ultimate rate tells you whether students eventually credential at all, which is the number that feeds employment. They answer different things, so we report both, and a result you are still waiting on counts in neither denominator, so a pending score never drags the rate down.
The small-cohort floor is there for honesty
A brand-new program with eight test-takers can swing wildly on a single result, and printing “62.5%” as if it were stable would mislead. Below ten takers we show the count and hold the rate back, so you never publish a number the cohort is too small to support. Zero takers reads as no data, not as a zero, because those are not the same thing.
A number you can defend to the decimal
When the accreditor asks for licensure pass rates, the answer should be one click and solid all the way down to the last digit. We track the sittings, compute both rates the right way, and refuse to print a number a small cohort cannot back up. That is the kind of telemetry you want locked in before the review, not improvised during it.
Ready to fly your school on one platform?
Go for launch, start free →